Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731498›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

The role of digital teaching methods in supporting practical skills training in the academic training of health professions - a scoping review.

Tjorven Stamer, Nora Machinek, Jost Steinhäuser, Mathilde Goujard, Kristina Flägel

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tjorven StamerInstitute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Luebeck, 23562, Germany. t.stamer@uni-luebeck.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9011-3775
Nora MachinekInstitute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Luebeck, 23562, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2388-4809
Jost SteinhäuserInstitute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Luebeck, 23562, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9386-6078
Mathilde GoujardInstitute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Luebeck, 23562, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6520-9335
Kristina FlägelInstitute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Luebeck, 23562, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1416-6293

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital teaching methods are established for imparting theoretical knowledge in the training of health professions. While digital formats are increasingly used in education, evidence on their capacity to teach practical and hands-on skills remains limited. It is unclear to what extent digital teaching methods can support the training of practical skills. This scoping review aimed to identify the digital teaching methods used to teach practical skills in the academic training of health professions and to offer an initial evaluation of their effectiveness.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was performed in June 2023 using the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection and CINAHL databases. An update of this initial search was performed in April 2025. Original studies on the digital teaching of practical skills in undergraduate academic training for health professions, published in German or English, were included. The studies were analyzed with regard to teaching methods, areas of application, authors and year, intervention used, outcomes and results.

resultsOut of 2,544 records, 292 studies were included. Interventions comprised simulators (n = 65), blended/hybrid teaching methods (n = 55), virtual reality (n = 48), e-learning platforms (n = 36), video-based teaching formats (n = 19), telecommunication tools (n = 18), mobile applications (n = 13), robotic simulators (n = 10), serious games or gamified learning (n = 10), specialized tools (n = 6), interactive learning systems (n = 6) and augmented reality (n = 6). 75% of the studies focused on medical education, followed by student training in nursing (18%) and physiotherapy (3%). The most common study designs were randomized controlled trials (42%), quasi-experimental designs (34%) and quantitative-descriptive designs (12%). Learning outcomes were predominantly assessed through knowledge tests, practical examinations (e.g., OSCEs) and participants' self-assessments. Across the included studies, most digital teaching methods demonstrated positive effects on the acquisition of practical skills, particularly simulation-based, VR-supported or otherwise interactive formats. The magnitude and consistency of these effects varied substantially across disciplines and study designs.

conclusionsDigital teaching methods offer promising approaches to support the training of practical skills, with interactive, simulation-based, and VR-supported formats showing particularly positive effects. Nevertheless, longitudinal studies examining the retention of practical skills over time remain scarce. Digital teaching methods should be specifically tailored to the practical skills being taught, making use of available resources.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceHealth OccupationsTeachingDigital HealthDigital MediaHumansAcademic trainingDigital teaching methodsHealth educationPractical skillsScoping reviewUndergraduate

Identifiers

PMID41731498
PMCPMC12955288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.