ArticleBMC medical education2026
Construction and implementation of an AI-enhanced progressive training model for clinical competency development in obstetrics and gynecology residents.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificially Intelligent Simulated Patients in Undergraduate Surgical Teaching: A Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.The clinical teacher · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to develop and validate the effectiveness of an artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced progressive training model for clinical competency development in obstetrics and gynecology residents and investigate innovative approaches to enhance the quality of obstetrics and gynecology resident training.
methodsA pre-post self-comparison research design was employed with 28 obstetrics and gynecology residents from three consecutive cohorts (2021–2023) as research subjects. The AI technologies utilized in this study included an intelligent case simulation platform, an adaptive learning algorithm-driven personalized training pathway system, and a competency-based intelligent assessment system. The “Three-Coordination” training model and “Four-Stage Progressive” teaching system were systematically integrated into the curriculum. Based on the “Four-Dimensional Integrated” clinical competency framework, standardized assessments, validated questionnaires, and semi-structured expert interviews were used to compare residents’ clinical competency development, learning experiences, and satisfaction before and after training.
resultsFollowing implementation the AI-enhanced progressive training model, residents demonstrated significant improvements in professional knowledge competency (74.3 ± 6.8 vs. 86.7 ± 5.4, p < 0.001), clinical skills competency (72.6 ± 7.3 vs. 88.5 ± 4.9, p < 0.001), clinical reasoning competency (68.4 ± 8.1 vs. 84.9 ± 5.7, p < 0.001), and professional conduct competency (76.5 ± 6.2 vs. 85.6 ± 5.3, p < 0.01). Assessment of five core clinical skills revealed post-training performance enhancements of 11.6% − 16.3% (p < 0.001). Multiple parameters measuring clinical case analysis capabilities improved by 9.8% − 15.7% (p < 0.001). Additionally, 92.9% of residents expressed satisfaction with the training model, and 100% of clinical instructors endorsed its potential for broader implementation.
conclusionsThe AI-enhanced progressive clinical competency training model significantly improved obstetrics and gynecology residents’ clinical competency across all measured domains, with particularly notable enhancements in clinical skills and reasoning abilities. The “Three-Coordination” training model and “Four-Stage Progressive” teaching system constitute a promising framework for advancing standardized training of obstetrics and gynecology residents and offer potential applications across other medical specialties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.