Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731489›Full record

Trial reportBMC surgery2026

Single-instrument intracorporeal ligation versus polymer clip closure of the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Sezgin Topuz, Ali İşler, Emrah Cengiz, Mehmet Fatih Yüzbaşıoğlu, Mehmet Buğra Bozan, İlhami Taner Kale

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06443749 (Closure of the Appendiceal Stump With a Polymer Clip Versus Intracorporeal Ligation With a Single Instrument in Laparoscopic Appendectomy; Prospective Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06443749 naunknown statusnot on this map

Closure of the Appendiceal Stump With a Polymer Clip Versus Intracorporeal Ligation With a Single Instrument in Laparoscopic Appendectomy; Prospective Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSezgin TopuzRan2024 to 2024Enrolled48ConditionsAppendectomyArmsappendectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sezgin TopuzDepartment of General Surgery, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine, Avşar Campus, West Ring Road Blvd. No: 251/A, Onikisubat, Kahramanmaraş, 46050, Turkey. sezgintpz@gmail.com.
Ali İşlerDepartment of General Surgery, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine, Avşar Campus, West Ring Road Blvd. No: 251/A, Onikisubat, Kahramanmaraş, 46050, Turkey.
Emrah CengizDepartment of General Surgery, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine, Avşar Campus, West Ring Road Blvd. No: 251/A, Onikisubat, Kahramanmaraş, 46050, Turkey.
Mehmet Fatih YüzbaşıoğluDepartment of General Surgery, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine, Avşar Campus, West Ring Road Blvd. No: 251/A, Onikisubat, Kahramanmaraş, 46050, Turkey.
Mehmet Buğra BozanDepartment of General Surgery, Elazığ Fethi Sekin City Hospital, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Elazığ, Turkey.
İlhami Taner KaleDepartment of General Surgery, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine, Avşar Campus, West Ring Road Blvd. No: 251/A, Onikisubat, Kahramanmaraş, 46050, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn laparoscopic appendectomy, stabilization of the appendix is required during knot-tying for stump closure. In the literature, additional ports or instruments have been used to achieve this stabilization. In our study, we employed a technical variation of intracorporeal knot-tying for appendiceal stump closure. This technique has not previously been used for this purpose. It does not require additional ports or instruments. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of this knot-tying technique on operative time and safety. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study was conducted in adult patients, who were prospectively randomized into two groups and subsequently underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. First group included patients with single-instrument intracorporeal ligation, whereas second group included patients with polymer clip closure. Neither group employed any instruments other than the standard laparoscopic instruments. The operation time of the patients, the time from the completion of the dissection to the removal of the specimen (closure time) and complications were compared.

resultsA total of 68 patients received laparoscopic appendectomy during the present study. There were 39 patients (57.4%) in the clip group and 29 patients (42.6%) in the ligation group. Of the 68 patients included in the study, 25 were women (36.8%) and 43 were men (63.2%). The median age of the patients was 34 (IQR:24–44) years. The mean body mass index (BMI) of the patients was 27.4 ± 4.5. Three patients were diagnosed with perforated appendicitis. Histopathological examination revealed acute appendicitis in 41 patients (60,3%), phlegmonous appendicitis in 26 patients (38.2%), and a normal appendix in 1 patient. The median operative time was 19 (IQR 13–28) minutes in the clip group and 35(IQR 30–45) minutes in the ligation group. Additionally, the median closure time was 3(2–9) minutes and 7 (4–13) minutes, respectively. Operative and closure times were longer in the Ligation Group (both, p = 0.00001). In the clip group, three patients developed wound site infections and one patient developed intra-abdominal abscess. In the ligation group, two patients developed wound site infections and one patient developed intra-abdominal abscess. There was no difference in total complication rates. (p = 1)

conclusionClosure using single-instrument ligation prolonged the procedure time compared to clip closure and resulted in similar complication rates. This technique, previously unused for closing the appendiceal stump, can be performed with standard laparoscopic instruments without requiring additional surgical instruments or incisions. The method employed could be regarded as a technique that ought to be included in a surgeon’s repertoire of skills for various clinical scenarios.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov (NCT06443749), 29.05.2024.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisAppendixLaparoscopySuture TechniquesAdultFemaleHumansLigationMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePolymersProspective StudiesSurgical InstrumentsPolymersAppendectomyAppendix stump closureLaparoscopicSingle instrumentSurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID41731489
PMCPMC13036903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.