Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731467›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Integrated in vivo and in vitro experiments with multi-omics analysis reveal SPP1 drives pancreatic cancer progression.

Mujing Ke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mujing KeDepartment of Ultrasound, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China. kmj029@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the expression pattern of SPP1 in pancreatic cancer and its role in the tumor immune microenvironment, with functional validation by in vivo and in vitro experiments.

methodsBioinformatics analyses were performed using TCGA and CCLE databases to assess SPP1 expression, prognostic value, and immune correlations in pan-cancer and pancreatic cancer. Single-cell transcriptomic and CellChat analyses were used to explore cell communication and immune microenvironment characteristics. An orthotopic pancreatic cancer mouse model was established, and in vivo and in vitro experiments including flow cytometry, Western blot, co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP), and in vivo ubiquitination assays were conducted to validate the immunoregulatory role of tumor-derived SPP1.

resultsSPP1 was highly expressed in pancreatic cancer and associated with poor prognosis, elevated immunosuppressive microenvironment scores, and increased M2 macrophage infiltration. Single-cell and cell communication analyses indicated that SPP1 was mainly derived from macrophages and ductal epithelial cells, contributing to immune-regulatory signaling. Functional experiments confirmed that SPP1 promoted M2 macrophage polarization, enhanced immunosuppressive cytokine expression, and facilitated tumor progression through immune microenvironment remodeling.

conclusionSPP1 plays a critical role in regulating macrophage polarization and shaping an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target.

Indexed as

OsteopontinPancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDisease ProgressionGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMacrophagesMiceMultiomicsPrognosisTumor MicroenvironmentOsteopontinSPP1 protein, humanIn vivo and in vitro experimentsMacrophage polarizationPancreatic cancerSPP1Tumor immune microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41731467
PMCPMC13036904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.