ArticleBMC public health2026
'We should be focusing on why we eat, what we eat and how it makes us feel, not how many calories it has': a photovoice study exploring young people's views on the out-of-home calorie labelling policy in England and their priorities for changing the local food environment.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundObesity is a complex problem, a perpetual challenge for governments to address. In 2022 as part of a government obesity strategy, a mandatory calorie labelling policy for out-of-home food sectors was implemented in England. Little is known about the impact of this policy on young people; therefore, this study explored young people views on the policy and their priorities for change in their local food environments.
methodsWe conducted a participatory, qualitative study using Photovoice with 20 young people (12–17 years old) living in two communities in areas of high deprivation in England, a coastal town and an inner-city neighbourhood. Young people were involved in photography-led focus groups, a photo ‘walkabout’ in their local highstreets, and a local community photography exhibition. A textual-visual thematic analysis framework was used to analyse textual and visual data.
resultsYoung people described challenges with navigating complex out-of-home food environments and reflected on whether the policy was effective in addressing these challenges. Three themes were identified: (1) Relevance of calories for informing healthy eating. Few found calories alone helpful to gauge whether something was healthy. However, some expressed surprise at the energy content of drinks and found calorie information useful for understanding ‘liquid calories’. (2) Commercial influences on food choices. Participants were aware of how commercial activities shaped their food environments, often in unequal ways, and how targeted marketing/advertising for young people can be more influential than calorie information on menus and food labels. (3) Value placed on the relational aspects of food. Young people recognised food as more than fuel, valuing its social and cultural significance and believing it should be produced and sold ethically and sustainably.
conclusionYoung people viewed calorie labelling as unhelpful for making healthy eating choices, emphasising instead the need to address structural barriers and support for them to navigate increasingly complex and inequitable food systems. They demonstrated their role as informed food citizens by exercising social responsibility to shape their food environments. It is therefore vital to amplify their voices in public discourse and support their participation in shaping food policy and governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.