ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Management of older adults consulting in GP surgery practices with back pain in UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum: population based study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe management of older adults with back pain in GP surgery practices is currently not well understood. We aimed to describe this and investigate if there are factors associated with variability in treatment.
methodsUsing primary care records from UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, we observed 594,559 adults aged 50 years and older with an index consultation for back pain between 1 January 2015 to 31 July 2018 over 18-months follow-up. Main outcome measures were time to first referral to (i) radiology, (ii) physiotherapy, (iii) exercise, physical activity programmes and musculoskeletal clinics and services, (iv) other clinics and services for further assessment, and (v) pain medication prescriptions.
resultsThe majority of patients received pain medication prescriptions following a back pain diagnosis (n = 381,829; 64.2%), but not referrals to radiology (n = 23,712; 4.0%), physiotherapy (n = 2,856; 0.5%), exercise, physical activity programmes and musculoskeletal clinics and services (n = 22,182; 3.7%) or other clinics and services for further assessment (n = 20,755; 3.5%). The probability of referrals or prescriptions at index consultation were (i) 2.6%, (ii) 0.3%, (iii) 1.7%, (iv) 1.3% and (v) 56.4% respectively. Opioids in combination with paracetamol or ibuprofen were most commonly prescribed (n = 151,390, 25.5%), followed by non-topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n = 127,164, 21.4%) and non-combination opioids dosage forms (n = 101,713, 17.1%). We observed large variability in the management of back pain within practice regions, age groups and socioeconomic status for all outcomes with the exception of pain medication prescriptions which showed little variation within factors of interest.
conclusionsOlder patients presenting to GP surgery practices with back pain are typically prescribed pain medications, with few referred for imaging, further therapy or assessment. Among non-pharmacological treatments, there exist differences by practice region, age, and socioeconomic status. Future work is needed to explore reasons for these differences, and to develop new clinical guidelines or tools to facilitate the standardisation of managing back pain in older adults within GP surgery practices in the UK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.