Observational studyBMC oral health2026
Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in endodontic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
Observational study in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPersistent apical periodontitis following failed nonsurgical endodontic treatment presents significant clinical challenges. This study evaluated the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors associated with surgical treatment using calcium-enriched mixture (CEM).
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study (STROBE-compliant), 197 teeth from 169 patients underwent surgical treatment at a tertiary center between 2011 and 2024. Inclusion required documented persistent apical periodontitis unresponsive to prior orthograde endodontic therapy and a minimum radiographic follow-up of 6 months. A standardized surgical protocol was followed, including root-end resection, ultrasonic root-end preparation, and root-end filling with CEM cement by a single endodontist. Treatment outcomes were assessed using composite clinical and radiographic criteria. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate survival probabilities, and Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to evaluate associations between clinical variables and treatment outcomes.
resultsThe mean follow-up duration was 45.2 ± 36.5 months. The overall success rate was 94.9% (187/197 teeth). Failure-free survivals were 96.4%, 92.7%, and 87.3% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified systemic disease as the sole significant predictor of failure (HR = 5.87; 95% CI: 1.52–22.68; p = 0.010). Tooth-related factors (lesion size, crown-root ratio, and root-end preparation depth) and demographic variables showed no significant associations. Intra-observer agreement was excellent (κ = 1.00; ICC = 0.83).
conclusionsCEM cement-based surgical treatment achieved 94.9% long-term success. Patients with systemic diseases exhibited a 5.87-fold higher failure risk, highlighting the critical role of medical status in prognostic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.