Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731447›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Multimodal analysis of cell-free DNA to improve early detection of gastric cancer.

Vo Duy Long, Le Anh Khoa Huynh, Dac Ho Vo, Thi Hue Hanh Nguyen, Thi Tuong Vi Van, Giang Thi Huong Nguyen, Thuy Nguyen Doan, Viet Hai Nguyen, Quang Dat Tran, Quang Thong Dang and 34 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

44 authors.

Vo Duy Long *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Le Anh Khoa Huynh *Medical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Dac Ho VoMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thi Hue Hanh NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thi Tuong Vi VanMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Giang Thi Huong NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thuy Nguyen DoanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Viet Hai NguyenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Quang Dat TranDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Quang Thong DangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Vu Tuan Anh NguyenDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Le Minh Quoc HoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thi Phuong Dung HaHa Noi Medical University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thi Ngoc Dung DangHa Noi Medical University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Pham Thanh Nhan NguyenDa Nang Oncology Hospital, Da Nang, Vietnam.
Khac Tien NguyenNghe An Oncology Hospital, Vinh City, Nghe An, Vietnam.
Van Chien HoNghe An Oncology Hospital, Vinh City, Nghe An, Vietnam.
Thi Loc LeThai Nguyen Central General Hospital, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam.
Thi Hong Nhung NguyenThai Nguyen Central General Hospital, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam.
Ngoc Hieu TuBuon Ma Thuot Medical University, Buon Ma Thuot, Vietnam.
Thanh Son TranBuon Ma Thuot Medical University, Buon Ma Thuot, Vietnam.
Thanh Xuan JasmineMedic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thi Loan VoMedic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thi Huong Thoang NaiMedic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thuy Trang TranMedic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
My Hoang TruongMedic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Ngan Chau TranMedic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thanh Cong NguyenMilitary Medical Hospital 175, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thi Truc NguyenMilitary Medical Hospital 175, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Bao Toan LeCan Tho Oncology Hospital, Can Tho, Vietnam.
Van Phong TangCan Tho Oncology Hospital, Can Tho, Vietnam.
Thi Tu NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Anh Tuan NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Hoang Giang VuMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thi Van PhanMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thi Ngoc Tien NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Hoang Anh CaoMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Trong Hieu NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Lan N TuMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Hoa GiangMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Minh Duy PhanMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Hoai-Nghia NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Van Thien Chi NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam. chinguyen@genesolutions.vn.
Le Son TranMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam. leson1808@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer remains a global health challenge due to the difficulty of detecting it early in asymptomatic, high-risk populations. Current invasive diagnostic methods are impractical for widespread screening. Liquid biopsy using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) shows promise, but early detection is hindered by the low abundance and heterogeneity of ctDNA.

methodsWe developed a multimodal cfDNA assay integrating methylation, fragmentomic, and hotspot mutation profiling from a single blood draw to detect gastric cancer-specific molecular signatures. Using these signatures, a machine-learning model was trained on a discovery cohort of 110 nonmetastatic GC patients and 119 healthy controls, then validated on an independent cohort of 58 patients and 65 controls.

resultsThe ensemble model achieved an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80–0.93), with 70.7% sensitivity and 92.3% specificity for detecting nonmetastatic GC. Incorporating hotspot mutation profiling increased overall sensitivity to 75.9% without affecting specificity. Compared to a previous multi-cancer model, our ensemble model showed improved sensitivity across all stages, particularly for early-stage GC (72.7% vs. 36.4%).

conclusionsThis multimodal cfDNA assay provides a minimally invasive and effective strategy for early GC detection, making it a potential screening tool for high-risk populations. This study presents a novel multimodal cfDNA assay that combines methylation, fragmentomic, and hotspot mutation profiling, achieving 75.9% sensitivity and 92.3% specificity for early gastric cancer detection.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNAEarly Detection of CancerStomach NeoplasmsAgedCase-Control StudiesDNA MethylationDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedMutationBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNACfDNAGastric cancerHotspot mutationsMethylation and fragmentomic

Identifiers

PMID41731447
PMCPMC13036984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.