ArticleBMC cancer2026
Breast cancer detection using microscopic images based on composition features.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the serious diseases that mainly affects women, and late diagnosis can lead to death. However, early detection significantly increases survival, thus making diagnosis very important. A reliable way to diagnose breast cancer is to analyze breast tissue samples under a microscope. Automatic classification techniques are very common in many fields in order to reduce human dependence. In this work, the combined process of three different methods for feature selection is used: (1) Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) to capture key structural and boundary points in microscopic images, (2) Local Binary Patterns (LBP) to extract local texture and intensity variations, and (3) statistical texture descriptors such as entropy, variance, contrast, and energy to quantify pixel-level distribution patterns. Our goal is to automatically determine whether a sample is malignant or benign. In the proposed method, the input dataset is divided into 5 categories, and cross-validation is performed with an accuracy of 95.89% (and an accuracy of 94.84% in the case of k = 10).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.