ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Comparative machine learning models for early prediction of preterm birth from maternal serum biomarkers.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreterm birth (PTB) is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Inflammation and metabolic disruption are involved in its pathology. This study aimed to assess maternal serum inflammatory and lipid markers as predictors of PTB using various machine learning models.
methodsWomen who were pregnant and attending antenatal clinics were recruited for this study. A group of 186 females who had their births before 37 weeks was marked PTB. One hundred forty women who delivered at term and met the same eligibility criteria were selected from the same source population during the study period. T-tests were used to evaluate variations in baseline and clinical parameters. Pearson correlations were visualized via a heatmap. We built models for random forests (RF), logistic regression (LR), XGBoost, and support vector machine (SVM) using a 70/30 train/test split and 5-fold cross-validation. Models performance was measured using accuracy and AUC.
resultsCRP (r ≈ 0.45), IL-6 (r ≈ 0.40), C3 (r ≈ 0.31), BMI, and lipids correlated positively with PTB, whereas HDL correlated inversely (r ≈ - 0.13). Multivariable logistic regression identified age, BMI, IL-6, C3, and CRP as independent predictors. All ML models showed good discrimination (test AUC ≥ 0.819); LR performed best (accuracy 78.57%, AUC 0.849) with cross-validated AUCs around 0.86-0.87 across models. SHAP analysis confirmed that IL-6, BMI, CRP, age, and C3 were dominant contributors to PTB risk.
conclusionsMaternal inflammation and high BMI are important risk factors for PTB in this cohort. The LR model combining clinical and serum measures is as good a predictor as a complex ML algorithm. It is an interpretable model that can help with risk assessment at an early stage in similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.