ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Presenting complaints and emergency triage priority of older adults hospitalized with delirium: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Delirium and in-hospital falls in older adults: factors associated with fall occurrence and number of falls.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine triage allocation in older adults hospitalized with delirium and identify factors associated with lower triage priority.
methodsRetrospective cohort study including patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted with delirium to geriatric acute care units. Triage was performed using the Swiss Emergency Triage Scale (SETS, levels 1–4). Patients assigned to levels 3–4 (low priority) were compared with those at levels 1–2 (high priority). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of lower priority triage.
resultsAmong 2889 patients with delirium (mean age 85 years; 54.7% female), 59.8% were triaged at SETS 1–2 (high priority) and 40.2% at SETS 3–4 (low priority). Lower-priority triage was driven by nonspecific presentations such as general decline (18.9%) and falls (11.6%), while dyspnea (28.1%) and acute neurological deficits (11%) were strongly associated with higher priority. Independent predictors of SETS 3–4 included higher functional independence (FIM, OR 1.01 per point, p < 0.001), dementia (OR 1.39, p = 0.001), psychiatric comorbidity (OR 1.31, p = 0.007), and higher pain scores (VAS, OR 1.04 per point, p = 0.027). Conversely, acute respiratory failure (OR 0.25, p < 0.001), acute heart failure (OR 0.66, p < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (OR 0.51, p = 0.017), pneumonia (OR 0.82, p = 0.038), other hypoxia-related conditions (OR 0.63, p = 0.007), higher leukocyte count (OR 0.98, p = 0.026), and psychotropic exposure (OR 0.83, p = 0.030) were associated with decreased odds of lower-priority assignment.
conclusionStandard emergency triage may underrecognize the clinical risk of delirium in older adults, particularly when presentations are nonspecific and cognitive or psychiatric comorbidities are present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.