Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731324›Full record

ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2026

Patterns of chronic ethanol drinking in male and female cynomolgus monkeys.

Joshua N Prete, Phillip M Epperly, Emily A Cronin, Althea P Floge, Paul W Czoty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua N PreteDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Phillip M EpperlyDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Emily A CroninDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Althea P FlogeDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Paul W CzotyDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1778-4625

Funding

NOP Receptors in nonhuman primate models of AUDR01AA027556 · NIAAA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CZOTY, PAUL W. · 2020 to 2024
$2.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA027556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical and preclinical alcohol use disorder (AUD) research demonstrates that males and females differ in motivations behind drinking, patterns of drinking behaviors, and alcohol-related physiological responses and health consequences. Nonhuman primate (NHP) models of AUD have the potential to enhance our understanding of such sex differences. In NHP models, schedule-induced polydipsia is a common method to initiate ethanol drinking. In males, characteristics of drinking during the final stage of induction, when monkeys consume 1.5 g/kg/day, predict subsequent drinking patterns when monkeys have unlimited access to ethanol. The present study assessed sex differences in those predictive behaviors during induction and characterized patterns and intakes during 6 months of ethanol drinking.

methodsEleven singly housed adult cynomolgus monkeys (six male, five female) were induced to consume water, then increasing doses of ethanol for 4 weeks per dose (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 g/kg) using a 300-s fixed-time schedule of food pellet delivery. Following induction, monkeys switched to an "open-access" regimen wherein water and ethanol were available 22 h/day, 5 days/week.

resultsPredictive relationships between drinking characteristics during the final phase of induction and subsequent open-access drinking were replicated, with no evidence of sex differences. Although weekly and total ethanol intakes were higher in males over 6 months of open access, the difference did not reach statistical significance. However, there were sex differences in the distribution of ethanol intake across the day. Males drank significantly more when meals were available, whereas females spread their drinking throughout the first half of the session; these differences were exacerbated in Month 2 and remained for the duration of the study.

conclusionsThese results replicate previous findings of a predictive relationship between drinking variables during induction and later open-access drinking and reveal sex differences in daily patterns of ethanol intake that may inform treatment approaches.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingEthanolSex CharacteristicsAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleMacaca fascicularisMaleSex FactorsEthanolalcoholnonhuman primatesschedule‐induced polydipsiasex differences

Identifiers

PMID41731324
PMCPMC12929704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.