Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731306›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2026

Validation and simplification of the MR PREDICTS @24H model for outcome prediction after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.

Xi Li, Bob Roozenbeek, Theo van Walsum, Daniel Bos, H Bart van der Worp, Bart J Emmer, Charles Bl Majoie, Robert J van Oostenbrugge, Diederik Wj Dippel, Hester F Lingsma and 1 more

Abstract readValidation StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xi LiDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-7899-8239
Bob RoozenbeekDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Theo van WalsumDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniel BosDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8979-2603
H Bart van der WorpDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bart J EmmerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charles Bl MajoieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert J van OostenbruggeDepartment of Neurology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1032-9099
Diederik Wj DippelDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9234-3515
Hester F LingsmaDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
ICAI Stroke Lab

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutcome prediction after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for ischemic stroke is important for patient counseling and rehabilitation planning. MR PREDICTS @24H, a nine-predictor model, showed excellent performance in predicting functional outcome at 90 days of patients with acute ischemic stroke. With the expanding treatment indications, we validated the model for patients receiving EVT within 24 hours after stroke onset and simplified it for easier clinical implementation.

methodsWe used individual patient data from the Dutch MR CLEAN Registry (2014-2018), a prospective observational cohort enrolling patients treated with EVT, and three randomized controlled trials MR CLEAN-MED, MR CLEAN-NOIV, and MR CLEAN-LATE (2018-2022). We included patients with an intracranial large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation treated with EVT within 24 hours of symptom onset or last seen well. We assessed the effect of predictors on functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) at 90 days with ordinal logistic regression. Predicted probabilities of functional independence (mRS 0-2) and survival (mRS 0-5) were derived from the model formula. We evaluated predictive performance with discrimination (C statistic) and calibration (intercept, slope). The model was simplified by excluding predictors based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC). We applied leave-one-study-out cross-validation to evaluate heterogeneity in model performance between the cohorts.

resultsThe validation cohort included 6154 patients: 4737 from the Registry and 1417 from the trials. External validation of the original model showed excellent discrimination in predicting functional independence (C statistic 0.91, 95% CI 0.90-0.92) and survival (C statistic 0.90, 95% CI 0.89-0.91). The simplified model, comprising four predictors-NIHSS at 24 hours after EVT, age, pre-stroke mRS, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage-performed comparably (functional independence C statistic 0.91, 95% CI 0.90-0.92; and survival 0.89, 95% CI 0.88-0.90). Cross-validation revealed heterogeneity between LATE and the other cohorts, with the model overestimating the probability of functional independence in LATE (observed 39.1% vs predicted 44.2%), whereas the observed and predicted probability of survival was similar (75.5% vs 75.7%).

conclusionsA simplified version of MR PREDICTS @24H including only four predictors performed as good as the full model, providing a practical tool that can be applied one day after EVT for reliable outcome estimation. Further validation and updating of the model are needed for patients treated in the late time window (6-24 h).

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeThrombectomyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRegistriesTreatment Outcomeendovascular therapyischemic strokemodel simplificationmodel validationpost-treatment outcomePrediction modelprognosis

Identifiers

PMID41731306
PMCPMC13601691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.