ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Appropriateness of Dissolution Methods on Evaluation of Digoxin Product Quality.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Formulation and Process Variables on the Stability and Quality Attributes of Digoxin Formulations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives of the present work were to simultaneously quantify digoxin (DGX) and its impurities by a common analytical method, compare dissolution data of a FDA approved commercial products by DGX tablets USP monograph, and apply the developed method to assess quality of the product. A UPLC method was developed and validated as per ICH guideline. An FDA approved formulation of DGX tablets was evaluated for quality (assay and dissolution), and stability by storing it at 30 °C/75% RH and 40 °C/75% RH conditions. Dissolution testing was performed in water and 0.1 N HCl as per the USP monograph. The UPLC method was specific, and linear over 100-2000 ng/ml with good accuracy > 98.6% and precision < 3.3% for all the analytes (DGX, digoxigenin, digoxigenin monodigitoxoside and digoxigenin bisdigitoxoside). The tablets met USP specification of assay > 98% and dissolution of > 85% in 20 min in water medium. However, the drug degrades into impurities in the acidic medium and fluorospectrometric method was non-specific in quantifying drug and impurities as per the USP monograph. Dissolution decreased by almost 30% on exposure to stability conditions and did not meet the specification due to an increase in the drug crystallinity as supported by the X-ray powder diffraction data. In summary, the developed UPLC method can be applied to assess the quality of DGX tablets, and dissolution testing in the acidic medium and fluorospectrometric method was non-discriminatory and non-specific for routine quality control test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41731292What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.