Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731292›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2026

Appropriateness of Dissolution Methods on Evaluation of Digoxin Product Quality.

Rizwan Shaikh, Swaroop J Pansare, Bhanu P Dongala, Sunil K Thota, Mohammad T H Nutan, Daniela Z Bazan, Mansoor A Khan, Ziyaur Rahman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rizwan ShaikhIrma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6759-3783
Swaroop J PansareIrma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1405-4164
Bhanu P DongalaIrma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8872-882X
Sunil K ThotaIrma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7737-2775
Mohammad T H NutanIrma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, Kingsville, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-9867
Daniela Z BazanIrma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4277-9886
Mansoor A KhanIrma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3649-3874
Ziyaur RahmanIrma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. rahman@tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0402-825X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of the present work were to simultaneously quantify digoxin (DGX) and its impurities by a common analytical method, compare dissolution data of a FDA approved commercial products by DGX tablets USP monograph, and apply the developed method to assess quality of the product. A UPLC method was developed and validated as per ICH guideline. An FDA approved formulation of DGX tablets was evaluated for quality (assay and dissolution), and stability by storing it at 30 °C/75% RH and 40 °C/75% RH conditions. Dissolution testing was performed in water and 0.1 N HCl as per the USP monograph. The UPLC method was specific, and linear over 100-2000 ng/ml with good accuracy > 98.6% and precision < 3.3% for all the analytes (DGX, digoxigenin, digoxigenin monodigitoxoside and digoxigenin bisdigitoxoside). The tablets met USP specification of assay > 98% and dissolution of > 85% in 20 min in water medium. However, the drug degrades into impurities in the acidic medium and fluorospectrometric method was non-specific in quantifying drug and impurities as per the USP monograph. Dissolution decreased by almost 30% on exposure to stability conditions and did not meet the specification due to an increase in the drug crystallinity as supported by the X-ray powder diffraction data. In summary, the developed UPLC method can be applied to assess the quality of DGX tablets, and dissolution testing in the acidic medium and fluorospectrometric method was non-discriminatory and non-specific for routine quality control test.

Indexed as

DigoxinBulk DrugsChemistry, PharmaceuticalChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDrug StabilityQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsSolubilityTabletsBulk DrugsDigoxinTabletsCrystallinityDigoxinDissolutionSpectrofluorometerStabilityValidation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.