ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
The Shape of Saccade-based Functional Visual Fields (FVFs): A cautionary note.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A Functional Visual Field (FVF) describes an area around the current point of fixation within which some task is done. In visual search, three types of FVF are of interest. The Resolution FVF describes the region within which a specific target can be identified. The Target FVF is a map of the starting point of saccades whose endpoint is a fixation on or near the target of the search, suggesting that the target was found from the previous fixation. If the endpoints of all saccades are normalized to land at one location, the Search FVF is the map of the starting points of all the saccades before the saccade to the target. We measured the Target and Search FVFs for observers as they searched for a T among Ls in regions of different shapes (vertical, horizontal, and triangular). The FVFs reflected the shapes of the regions. These FVF shapes arise as a by-product of a random walk in a constrained space. The results suggest a cautious interpretation of the shapes of FVFs in other studies. The FVF sizes and other aspects of the scanpaths probably remain informative, even if the shape might reflect the shape of the stimulus field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41731277What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.