ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
The preparedness of urologists to manage cardiopulmonary arrest during robot-assisted surgery.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More patients with significant comorbidities and greater perioperative risk are being selected for robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in urology. Cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) during RAS is an intraoperative complication that poses unique challenges. This exploratory study surveyed practicing urologists to describe preparedness to manage CPA events during RAS. An expert-developed survey was distributed via social media platforms and during international urology conferences between June 2023 and March 2025. The questionnaire assessed demographic characteristics, training background, exposure to CPA during RAS, and institutional preparedness. A total of 50 responses were included in the final analysis. Among 50 respondents, 94% were male, 74% were over 35 years old, and 56% practiced in the United States. Over half (56%) were fellowship-trained. CPA events during RAS were most commonly witnessed by respondents during residency training (76%). However, 78% had never received formal instruction on management of CPA during RAS. Of those who had, training occurred during residency (12%), fellowship (6%), or instructional courses (12%). Most (80%) were unaware of any institutional protocols for CPA during RAS. Respondents selected similar initial management steps and post-arrest strategies across hypothetical scenarios for CPA during pelvic and renal RAS. These findings identify variability in self-reported training exposure and protocol awareness, suggesting areas where structured education and institutional intervention may be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.