ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
The choice is yours: Binding and retrieval of free-choice responses.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Feature binding has emerged as an important mechanism in the coordination of human action control. Apparently, the simple mechanisms of binding of individual features and retrieval of recently integrated episodes play a significant role in the selection, initiation, and execution of goal-directed actions. Importantly, ideomotor approaches suggest that the stimulus-driven (i.e., forced-choice) as well as the internally generated (i.e., free-choice) activation of a response representation should lead to facilitation of that response in behavior. Against these predictions we separately investigated binding and retrieval of free-choice response in modified response-response binding tasks. In Experiment 1a, we investigated whether binding and retrieval of responses influence a free-choice action and found that response-response binding effects influenced performance in a current free-choice action. In Experiment 1b, we investigated whether a free-choice response can initiate the process of event file retrieval and found response-response binding effects, indicating that event file retrieval can be triggered by a free-choice response. In Experiment 1c, we investigated whether a free-choice response can be bound to another response and found response-response binding effects, indicating shared representations of free-choice and forced-choice responses. These findings are in line with ideomotor approaches suggesting that the same mechanisms of binding and retrieval also operate on representations of free-choice actions. They further demonstrate that both processes can dynamically operate across extended action sequences that integrate both forced-choice and free-choice actions, thereby highlighting their general role in flexible action control. Data of the experiments are available at OSF ( https://osf.io/t7pjb/?view_only=1af9b6ce0c1c4e19ab7a79a4b0bd176f ), and none of the experiments was preregistered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.