Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731232›Full record

SynthesisAmbio2026

Adapting the social practice of beekeeping to a changing climate.

Simon P Meisch, Scott R Bremer, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Manuel Hempel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simon P MeischInternational Centre for Ethics in the Sciences and Humanities, University of Tübingen, Wilhelmstr. 56, 72074, Tübingen, Germany. simon.meisch@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3388-2305
Scott R BremerCentre for the Study of the Sciences and Humanities, University of Bergen, Parkveien 9, 5007, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4505-9386
Etienne Dunn-SigouinNORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Jahnebakken 5, 5007, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5130-064X
Manuel HempelNORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Jahnebakken 5, 5007, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7021-3092

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 804150H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 895008Norges Forskningsråd 309562Norges Forskningsråd 323303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beekeeping offers a lens to study climate change, linking ecological dynamics with cultural practices, technologies, and livelihoods. While ecological impacts on bees and pollination are well studied, less is known about how beekeeping as a social practice adapts. This systematic review synthesizes 27 peer-reviewed studies across regions and disciplines, guided by social practice theory. We examine five interrelated dimensions-competences, materials, meanings, temporalities, and more-than-human relations-shaping beekeeping under climatic stress. Findings show adaptation is not limited to technical fixes. It includes changes in knowledge, hive design, timing, and shifts in cultural meanings and relations with bees and landscapes. Strategies range from hive modifications and transhumance to community learning and new framings of risk. However, adaptive capacity is uneven. Conceptualizing beekeeping as a climate-sensitive practice advances inter- and transdisciplinary dialogue and fosters more inclusive and effective adaptation strategies. This approach to reviewing practical climate micro-adaptation is replicable in other fields of practice.

Indexed as

BeekeepingClimate ChangeAnimalsBeesHumansBeekeepingClimate adaptationMicro-adaptationSocial practicesTemporality, more-than-human interactions

Identifiers

PMID41731232
PMCPMC13438083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.