ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Prediction of uncertain visual trajectories is biased toward motion continuity.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual motion prediction under uncertainty must rely on both statistical and kinematic properties of the stimulus. Here, we investigated how decision-making processes and psychophysical parameters are modulated during extrapolation of random trajectories with different noise characteristics (Random Walk, RDW, or Independently and Identically Distributed, IID). Noise was applied to the horizontal position of a dot moving downward with constant vertical speed and vanishing before reaching the edge of the screen. Participants had to judge whether the dot would reach the edge right or left of the center. In Experiment 1 we varied the side of the last visible horizontal position, optimal for RDW extrapolation, and the mean of all visible positions, optimal for IID, to be either on the same or on opposite sides of the screen center. Experiment 2 investigated how the final segment of an IID path impacts the trajectory extrapolation when the last visible position and the mean of the last segment are on opposite sides of the center. Experiment 3 focused on assessing the accuracy of trajectory perception amid varying levels of noise. Behavioral and DDM (Diffusion Decision Model) analyses revealed that for RDW trajectories, participants relied on the last visible position, reflecting the temporal continuity of the path and leading to faster and more accurate decision making. IID trajectories showed greater variability in prediction strategies, with participants also focusing more on the last segment, as with RDW, rather than the mean position of the whole previous trajectory. However, this strategy works well even for IID paths despite being a suboptimal solution. These findings suggest that the perceptual system favors smooth motion for visual interpretation, aiding in the prediction of uncertain visual trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41731230What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.