Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731228›Full record

Trial reportAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Effects of Profhilo® Tissue Bioremodeling on Skin Texture and Perioral Wrinkles: A Randomized Controlled Triple-Blind Clinical Trial.

Gildete Zanella, Fernanda Taise de Souza Ataíde, Tuanny Carvalho de Lima Bonato, Jairo Matozinho Cordeiro, Renato Assis Machado, Giancarlo De La Torre Canales, Mariana Barbosa Câmara-Souza

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gildete ZanellaIngá University Center - Uningá, Rod. PR 317, 6114 Parque Industrial 200, Maringá, PR, 87035-510, Brazil.
Fernanda Taise de Souza AtaídeIngá University Center - Uningá, Rod. PR 317, 6114 Parque Industrial 200, Maringá, PR, 87035-510, Brazil.
Tuanny Carvalho de Lima BonatoIngá University Center - Uningá, Rod. PR 317, 6114 Parque Industrial 200, Maringá, PR, 87035-510, Brazil.
Jairo Matozinho CordeiroUniversity Center of Associated Teaching Faculties - UNIFAE, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renato Assis MachadoIngá University Center - Uningá, Rod. PR 317, 6114 Parque Industrial 200, Maringá, PR, 87035-510, Brazil.
Giancarlo De La Torre CanalesIngá University Center - Uningá, Rod. PR 317, 6114 Parque Industrial 200, Maringá, PR, 87035-510, Brazil.
Mariana Barbosa Câmara-SouzaIngá University Center - Uningá, Rod. PR 317, 6114 Parque Industrial 200, Maringá, PR, 87035-510, Brazil. macamara@prof.unisa.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9961-121X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo clinically evaluate dermal thickness, pores, and wrinkles after using Profhilo® in perioral regions. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis split-face study included 12 female participants aged 45 to 65 with visible signs of perioral aging. After selection, a blinded operator randomly allocated the right and left sides to receive either treatment (experimental group-Profhilo®) or placebo (control group-saline solution). Treatment consisted of two sessions spaced 30 days apart. For the first session, 3 points were marked on the cutaneous portion of the upper lip and 2 points on the lower lip, at 5 mm from the beginning of the mucosa, for each side of the face. The amount of product injected in each session was 1 ml of Profhilo®. The same proportion of saline solution was used on the opposite side of the upper and lower lips, following the same application points. After 30 days, a local evaluation and application of the second session were performed, following the same protocol as the first. At 60 days, digital stereophotogrammetry, ultrasound of the perioral region, and standardized photographic images were performed. In addition, the volunteers answered the Face-Q questionnaire to assess satisfaction with the treatment, signs of aging, post-procedure recovery, and psychological factors. Subsequently, the data collected were tabulated and analyzed using paired t-test and Wilcoxon test, with a significance level of 5%.

resultsStereophotogrammetry revealed visual improvements in wrinkles and pores after the application of Profhilo®. Ultrasonography indicated an increase in dermal thickness for both Profhilo® (p = 0.016) and placebo (p < 0.001). A substantial proportion of participants expressed dissatisfaction with the decision to undergo treatment (36.4%) and the treatment outcomes (54.5%). Most participants reported mild recovery symptoms, with only one noting extreme sensitivity, discomfort, and itching. The intervention evaluated psychological function, appearance, and aging, which resulted in statistically significant improvements in psychological scores (p = 0.014) and aging assessment (p = 0.008).

conclusionProfhilo® reduced wrinkles and pore size; however, its impact on dermal thickness did not exceed the placebo effect, and patients were not fully satisfied with outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Hyaluronic AcidSkin AgingAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLipMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionTreatment OutcomeHyaluronic AcidHyaluronic acidLipRejuvenationSkin aging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.