ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Intelligibility of interrupted and checkerboard speech with two talkers: Further evidence for four speech cue channels.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Segregating target speech in a multi-talker background would require organizing speech fragments into a coherent stream of speech. The current investigation explored the intelligibility of temporally interrupted and checkerboard (interrupted in time and frequency) speech stimuli with one and two talkers. A series of experiments with one-talker stimuli revealed that the intelligibility of interrupted speech became lowest at around a 255-ms segment duration. In contrast, for two- and four-band checkerboard speech, the minimum intelligibility occurred at around 113-160-ms segment durations. Two-talker experiments revealed that no phonemic restoration was found, and that signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) between target and competing talkers had no clear effect on the target intelligibility of interrupted (and staggered) speech and two- and four-band checkerboard speech. Still, SNRs dominated the intelligibility of two-talker checkerboard speech with eight or more frequency bands. The probability summation model may account for the intelligibility minimum in both interrupted and checkerboard speech with a single talker. The results suggest that the four speech cue channels explain the similarity of the intelligibility curves for two- and four-band checkerboard speech.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41731222What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.