Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731222›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

Intelligibility of interrupted and checkerboard speech with two talkers: Further evidence for four speech cue channels.

Jun Hasegawa, Kazuo Ueda, Hiroshige Takeichi, Gerard B Remijn, Emi Hasuo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jun HasegawaAcoustic Design Course, Graduate School of Design, Kyushu University, 4-9-1 Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan.
Kazuo UedaDepartment of Acoustic Design, Faculty of Design/Research Center for Applied Perceptual Science/Research and Development Center for Five-Sense Devices, Kyushu University, 4-9-1 Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan. ueda@design.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Hiroshige TakeichiOpen Systems Information Science Team, Advanced Data Science Project (ADSP), RIKEN Information R&D and Strategy Headquarters (R-IH), RIKEN, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, 230-0045, Japan.
Gerard B RemijnDepartment of Acoustic Design, Faculty of Design/Research Center for Applied Perceptual Science, Kyushu University, 4-9-1 Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan.
Emi HasuoDepartment of Acoustic Design, Faculty of Design/Research Center for Applied Perceptual Science, Kyushu University, 4-9-1 Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP19H00630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segregating target speech in a multi-talker background would require organizing speech fragments into a coherent stream of speech. The current investigation explored the intelligibility of temporally interrupted and checkerboard (interrupted in time and frequency) speech stimuli with one and two talkers. A series of experiments with one-talker stimuli revealed that the intelligibility of interrupted speech became lowest at around a 255-ms segment duration. In contrast, for two- and four-band checkerboard speech, the minimum intelligibility occurred at around 113-160-ms segment durations. Two-talker experiments revealed that no phonemic restoration was found, and that signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) between target and competing talkers had no clear effect on the target intelligibility of interrupted (and staggered) speech and two- and four-band checkerboard speech. Still, SNRs dominated the intelligibility of two-talker checkerboard speech with eight or more frequency bands. The probability summation model may account for the intelligibility minimum in both interrupted and checkerboard speech with a single talker. The results suggest that the four speech cue channels explain the similarity of the intelligibility curves for two- and four-band checkerboard speech.

Indexed as

AttentionCuesPerceptual MaskingSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhoneticsPsychoacousticsYoung AdultDegraded speech perceptionMaskingPsychoacousticsSelective attention

Identifiers

PMID41731222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.