Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731190›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Follow-up of suspected child maltreatment cases treated at a tertiary child protection service facility.

Eva Anna Mora-Theuer, Sophie Klomfar, Christoph Krall, Chryssa Grylli, Klara Doppler, Maria Kletecka-Pulker, Sabine Völkl-Kernstock, Gabriel Otterman, Paul Plener, Judit Simon and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eva Anna Mora-TheuerForensic Examination Centre for Children and Adolescents, Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Sophie KlomfarForensic Examination Centre for Children and Adolescents, Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Christoph KrallCenter for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Chryssa GrylliForensic Examination Centre for Children and Adolescents, Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Klara DopplerInstitute for Ethics and Law in Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Maria Kletecka-PulkerForensic Examination Centre for Children and Adolescents, Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Sabine Völkl-KernstockForensic Examination Centre for Children and Adolescents, Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Gabriel OttermanBarnafrid National Centre On Violence Against Children, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Paul PlenerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Judit SimonDepartment of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Susanne Greber-PlatzerForensic Examination Centre for Children and Adolescents, Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria. susanne.greber-platzer@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

Austrian Federal Ministry for Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection GZ: BMASK-40030/0002-IV/A/7/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The victim's physical and emotional safety are foremost priorities in the clinical care of suspected child maltreatment (CM). The WHO recommends follow-ups, but we lack standardized procedures. This study examined case characteristics in relation to outcomes and follow-up (FU) feasibility at the Forensic Examination Center for Children and Adolescents (FOrensische Kinder- und JugendUntersuchungsStelle, FOKUS), Austria's first tertiary healthcare service offering regular FUs of CM cases. Suspected CM cases presented to FOKUS between July 2015 and June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed regarding one-year FU outcomes. FU feasibility, timing of FU, and reasons for delay or no FU were investigated. Two groups (FU vs. no FU) were compared. In the FU group, cases discharged from FOKUS services after the initial FU visit were compared with those remaining under FOKUS care regarding child protection (federal child protection service involvement, reports to law enforcement), safety procedures (new CM incidents, new injuries/findings/observations, contact with suspected perpetrator), and therapeutic interventions. Associations between case characteristics (age, gender, FU length, suspected CM type, perpetrator) and the groups were analyzed using logistic regression models. Of 219 cases, FU was feasible in 64%. Inaccessibility of families was the main reason for no FU. Followed patients were younger and perpetrators were more often parents (OR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.10-3.99). Suspected sexual abuse cases and those with new CM incidents were less frequently discharged (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.10-0.85 and OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.66).

conclusionCM case characteristics permit personalized, structured FU planning and scheduling to improve safety and continuity of care. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The WHO recommends regular follow-up (FU) of suspected child maltreatment cases to ensure patient safety and prevent further harm, but standardized procedures are lacking. • In Austria, hospital-based child protection teams are legally required, yet systematic FUs and structured safety monitoring are rarely implemented nor legally required. WHAT IS NEW: • This first CM follow-up study from Austria's tertiary child protection service (FOKUS) shows that FU was feasible in 64% of cases. • The results suggest that case characteristics influence the success of FU. Structured, individualized FU and sufficient resources are essential to enhance patient safety and long-term protection.

Indexed as

Child AbuseChild Protective ServicesAdolescentAustriaChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersChild protectionCommunity child healthNon-accidental injuryPediatric A&E and ambulatory care

Identifiers

PMID41731190
PMCPMC12929231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.