Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731182›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026

"It was up to me to be curious": perceptions and experiences of students with intellectual disability on genetics and health education.

Jennifer Hansen, Iva Strnadová, Joanne Danker, Karen-Maia Jackaman, Julie Loblinzk Refalo Oam, Skie Sarfaraz, Jackie Leach Scully, Jackie Boyle, Bronwyn Terrill, Elizabeth Emma Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Advances in genomic medicine: from diagnosis to patient perspectives.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer HansenSchool of Education, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Iva StrnadováSchool of Education, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. i.strnadova@unsw.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8513-5400
Joanne DankerSchool of Education, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Karen-Maia JackamanSchool of Education, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Julie Loblinzk Refalo OamSchool of Education, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Skie SarfarazSchool of Education, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jackie Leach ScullySchool of Education, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jackie BoyleDiscipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9943-8955
Bronwyn TerrillClinical Translation and Engagement Platform, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Elizabeth Emma PalmerDiscipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1844-215X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with intellectual disability want to learn more about their health and genetics. They want to be empowered with the knowledge and skills to make informed health and genetic healthcare choices. Little is known about what high school students with intellectual disability learn about health, genetics or genetic healthcare. To address this gap, we conducted an inclusive qualitative research study in Australia. Fourteen Australian current and recently graduated students with intellectual disability participated in semi-structured interviews. Inductive content analysis revealed four key themes: (i) Science, health and genetics education, (ii) Health rights, (iii) Education rights, (iv) Recommendations for improving genetic and health literacy. Students with intellectual disability reported they were not taught about genetics and health, making healthcare choices, and/or making life decisions at school. They felt these disadvantages and were disempowered in becoming informed healthcare consumers. They recommended that teachers should be supported with resources to deliver inclusive, person-centred and respectful lessons that inform decision-making about genetics, health and healthcare choices. Future research should focus on how best to upskill teachers to support students with intellectual disability for their future health choices in a respectful, supportive, student-centred and strengths-based way. This will help prepare young people with intellectual disability to navigate the healthcare system and be empowered partners in their own healthcare. The growth of such skills has been suggested as critical in inequities in healthcare access for people with intellectual disability, as well as improving healthcare experiences and outcomes.

Indexed as

Health EducationIntellectual DisabilityStudentsAdolescentAustraliaFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID41731182
PMCPMC13046871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.