ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
"It was up to me to be curious": perceptions and experiences of students with intellectual disability on genetics and health education.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in genomic medicine: from diagnosis to patient perspectives.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with intellectual disability want to learn more about their health and genetics. They want to be empowered with the knowledge and skills to make informed health and genetic healthcare choices. Little is known about what high school students with intellectual disability learn about health, genetics or genetic healthcare. To address this gap, we conducted an inclusive qualitative research study in Australia. Fourteen Australian current and recently graduated students with intellectual disability participated in semi-structured interviews. Inductive content analysis revealed four key themes: (i) Science, health and genetics education, (ii) Health rights, (iii) Education rights, (iv) Recommendations for improving genetic and health literacy. Students with intellectual disability reported they were not taught about genetics and health, making healthcare choices, and/or making life decisions at school. They felt these disadvantages and were disempowered in becoming informed healthcare consumers. They recommended that teachers should be supported with resources to deliver inclusive, person-centred and respectful lessons that inform decision-making about genetics, health and healthcare choices. Future research should focus on how best to upskill teachers to support students with intellectual disability for their future health choices in a respectful, supportive, student-centred and strengths-based way. This will help prepare young people with intellectual disability to navigate the healthcare system and be empowered partners in their own healthcare. The growth of such skills has been suggested as critical in inequities in healthcare access for people with intellectual disability, as well as improving healthcare experiences and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.