ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Inference of drowning sites of cases in the Pearl river based on microbial community profiling and random forest algorithm.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate inference of drowning sites remains a critical challenge in forensic investigations, particularly for corpses recovered from dynamic aquatic environments. Conventional methods, such as diatom testing, are limited by the absence or scarcity of diatoms in certain water bodies, labor-intensive morphological identification, and challenges in distinguishing morphologically similar species. In this study, we explored the feasibility of inferring drowning sites in human cases by integrating pulmonary microbial community profiling with machine learning. A total of 56 lung tissue samples from confirmed drowning victims were collected from four regions of the Pearl River’s Guangzhou section, including the central urban waterfront (site1), mid-reach brackish transition zone (site2), southern estuarine outflow zone (site3), and eastern tributary confluence (site4). High-throughput sequencing of the 16 S rRNA gene (V3 – V4 region) was performed to characterize microbial community composition. Significant spatial heterogeneity in pulmonary microbiota was observed across drowning sites, as demonstrated by alpha diversity analysis, unweighted UniFrac-based principal coordinates analysis, and differential abundance testing. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) further identified 111 differentially abundant microbial taxa, providing biological interpretation of spatial microbial variation among groups. To enable drowning site inference, microbial features at the genus level were subjected to feature engineering using a hybrid strategy combining variance thresholding and the Boruta algorithm. Through this process, 32 genera—including Ralstonia, Sphingomonas, Akkermansia, and Faecalibacterium—were selected as key microbial markers for geolocation. Multiple classification models, including Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression (LR), were constructed and compared. The RF model exhibited the superior predictive performance, achieving a test set accuracy of 92.3% and a macro-average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.949. External validation using five independent cases further confirmed the model’s practical utility, correctly predicting the drowning sites for four of the victims. Overall, This study preliminarily demonstrates the feasibility of inferring drowning locations through pulmonary microbiome analysis combined with machine learning in human samples, demonstrating the novel application of this approach to human cases. Future efforts should expand geographic sampling and integrate environmental metadata to enhance methodological robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41731166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.