ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Clinical pharmacology of antiplatelet drugs: implications for personalized therapy.
Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thymoquinone in Atherosclerosis: A Multi-Target Nutraceutical Modulating Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Lipid Metabolism.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Urolithin A has antiplatelet effects in contrast to its glucuronide, urolithin B, and isourolithin A.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis review describes the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of currently available antiplatelet drugs, with an emphasis on implications for personalized therapy.
methodsScientific literature published between January 1985 and December 2025 was collected from electronic databases. Primary research papers, reviews, and clinical practice guideline articles were included for discussion.
resultsAspirin and thienopyridine-type adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists (clopidogrel and ticlopidine) irreversibly inhibit their targets throughout the platelet lifespan, but daily dosing is required to inhibit newly formed platelets. In addition, clopidogrel bioactivity is affected by polymorphisms and interactions with cytochrome P450 2C19; while ticlopidine is rarely used due to serious side effects, such as blood dyscrasia. Newer ADP receptor antagonists (prasugrel, ticagrelor, and cangrelor) are more potent than clopidogrel and ticlopidine. Both high-dose aspirin and ADP receptor antagonists are recommended in acute settings, such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and acute ischemic stroke, because they are associated with more rapid and potent antiplatelet activity. Moreover, recent evidence based on clinical and pharmacological data suggests that optimization of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and ADP receptor antagonists can enable more effective management of thrombosis. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors (cilostazol and dipyridamole) are weaker antiplatelets that are used in combination with aspirin or clopidogrel in secondary stroke prevention. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors might be considered as adjunct therapy in ACS patients undergoing PCI who present with large thrombus burden. Vorapaxar is a thrombin receptor antagonist; and its slow receptor dissociation rate, coupled with a very long plasma half-life, might increase bleeding risk and limit its clinical use.
conclusionOverall, the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of antiplatelets strongly support development of personalized antiplatelet therapy to achieve therapeutic outcomes and minimize the risks of unwanted effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41731149What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.