Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731148›Full record

ReviewNPJ precision oncology2026

Integrating liquid biopsy and mutational signatures to advance precision oncology.

Raquel Carrasco, Kristian Dreij

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Special Issue "Molecular Biomarkers in Cancers: Advances and Challenges".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raquel CarrascoInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden. raquel.carrasco.romo@ki.se.
Kristian DreijInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 2022-03471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effective application of precision oncology in solid tumors remains challenging due to genetic heterogeneity and the absence of actionable alterations in some cancers. In this review, we discuss the integration of liquid biopsy and mutational signatures as a potential framework to address these limitations by enabling longitudinal detection of mutational processes that arise during tumor development and evolution. Together, these complementary approaches hold substantial promise for enhancing cancer screening, refining diagnosis, and guiding personalized therapeutic strategies, thereby advancing the field of precision oncology.

Identifiers

PMID41731148
PMCPMC12996293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.