ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
The CALLY index as a comprehensive inflammation-nutrition-immunity marker for prognosis in gastric cancer surgery.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic value of the CALLY index for functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and exploratory quantitative synthesis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReliable preoperative prognostic tools that comprehensively reflect host-related factors remain limited for gastric cancer (GC). The C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index integrates systemic inflammation, nutritional status, and immune competence. We evaluated its prognostic performance compared with commonly used inflammation-nutrition indices.
methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma, with temporal validation. Preoperative laboratory parameters obtained within 1 week before surgery were used to calculate the CALLY index. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and 30 day postoperative morbidity. Discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis; survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression; postoperative morbidity was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression.
resultsThe development cohort included 992 patients, and the temporal validation cohort included 302 patients. In the development cohort, the optimal CALLY cutoff was 2.61. For 5 year OS, the CALLY index showed the highest discriminative ability (AUC = 0.708), comparable to mGPS (AUC = 0.705) and superior to other indices (AUC ≤ 0.675). A low CALLY index was significantly associated with poorer OS and DFS (both p < 0.001) and remained independently prognostic after multivariable adjustment (OS HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.20-2.03; DFS HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.16-1.90). Low CALLY was also independently associated with increased risks of overall and severe postoperative complications, with consistent directions observed in the validation cohort.
conclusionsThe preoperative CALLY index independently predicts long-term survival and short-term postoperative morbidity in patients with GC undergoing curative gastrectomy. Compared with conventional inflammation-nutrition scores, CALLY shows comparable-to-slightly better and more consistent prognostic performance across endpoints, although absolute gains in discrimination are modest. Prospective multicenter validation with standardized assays, prespecified analyses, and recalibration is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41731142What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.