Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731124›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Acceptability of a practical geriatric assessment intervention with older adult cancer survivors and community health workers/promotoras: a qualitative investigation.

Alex J Fauer, Sandra Calderon, Quynh Vo, Miriam Hernandez, Angela Usher, Chad Y Han, Frederick J Meyers, Diana L Miglioretti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alex J FauerBetty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, 2450 48th St., Ste 2600, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. ajfauer@health.ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-1593
Sandra CalderonBetty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, 2450 48th St., Ste 2600, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Quynh VoBetty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, 2450 48th St., Ste 2600, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Miriam HernandezVisión y Compromiso, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Angela UsherComprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Chad Y HanCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Frederick J MeyersComprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Diana L MigliorettiComprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.

Funding

UC Davis Paul Calabresi K12 Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA138464 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BIRKELAND, ANDREW CHARLES, LARA, PRIMO N. · 2011 to 2025
$11.4M
NCI NIH HHS 5K12CA138464NCI NIH HHS K12 CA138464NCI NIH HHS L30 CA294179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDetermine the acceptability of a community-based, practical Geriatric Assessment (GA) intervention among community health workers (Promotoras) and cancer survivor key informants. Promotora-delivered health assessment, education, and social support models of care are feasible and effective in chronic disease management, but more evidence is needed in the cancer survivorship context. Promotoras function as a bridge, connecting community-based services with populations with historically limited healthcare engagement.

methodsDescriptive qualitative design. We held focus groups with promotora key informants and interviews with older cancer survivor consultants, between January and February 2024. Researchers developed a semi-structured interview guide, informed by conceptual models and an implementation framework, to facilitate perceptions of promotora-guided interventions, GA, and cancer survivorship. Researchers performed content analysis with deductive and inductive techniques on transcribed interviews.

resultsAcceptability of the GA intervention was described by promotoras and cancer survivor consultants within three distinct categories: The GA intervention employs a motivator to help address survivorship complexities; the GA intervention plans for impaired ADLs and IADLs in survivorship; the GA intervention integrates promotoras with clinical oncology care.

conclusionThe proposed implementation of a practical GA intervention by promotoras was deemed acceptable. The findings provided essential contextual data to ensure that the pilot, practical GA study can establish feasibility and preliminary efficacy.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsCommunity Health WorkersGeriatric AssessmentNeoplasmsAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial SupportCancerCommunity engagementCommunity health workerGeriatric oncologyPromotoras de saludSupportive care

Identifiers

PMID41731124
PMCPMC12929298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.