ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Acceptability of a practical geriatric assessment intervention with older adult cancer survivors and community health workers/promotoras: a qualitative investigation.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDetermine the acceptability of a community-based, practical Geriatric Assessment (GA) intervention among community health workers (Promotoras) and cancer survivor key informants. Promotora-delivered health assessment, education, and social support models of care are feasible and effective in chronic disease management, but more evidence is needed in the cancer survivorship context. Promotoras function as a bridge, connecting community-based services with populations with historically limited healthcare engagement.
methodsDescriptive qualitative design. We held focus groups with promotora key informants and interviews with older cancer survivor consultants, between January and February 2024. Researchers developed a semi-structured interview guide, informed by conceptual models and an implementation framework, to facilitate perceptions of promotora-guided interventions, GA, and cancer survivorship. Researchers performed content analysis with deductive and inductive techniques on transcribed interviews.
resultsAcceptability of the GA intervention was described by promotoras and cancer survivor consultants within three distinct categories: The GA intervention employs a motivator to help address survivorship complexities; the GA intervention plans for impaired ADLs and IADLs in survivorship; the GA intervention integrates promotoras with clinical oncology care.
conclusionThe proposed implementation of a practical GA intervention by promotoras was deemed acceptable. The findings provided essential contextual data to ensure that the pilot, practical GA study can establish feasibility and preliminary efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.