Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2026
Exploratory biomarkers for oxaliplatin-induced nivolumab responsiveness in metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer.
Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global research trends in fecal microbiota transplantation combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer immunotherapy: a bibliometric analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe randomised METIMMOX trial evaluated short-course oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy alternating with nivolumab for metastatic microsatellite-stable/mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer. In a post hoc analysis, we investigated whether tumour mutations or patients' systemic inflammation might provide insights into responsiveness to the METIMMOX regimen.
methodsPatients received either oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (control group) or alternating two cycles each of chemotherapy and nivolumab (experimental group), with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint. Tumour biopsies were sequenced with the TruSight Oncology 500 assay.
resultsThe median tumour mutational burden (TMB; in mutations/megabase) was 8 (range, 1-13). The experimental-arm patients with TMB ≥9 or BRAF-V600E mutation (n = 17) achieved median PFS of 19.8 months (95% confidence interval, 11.3-28.3), longer (p = 0.0090) than experimental-arm patients with TMB < 9 not BRAF-V600E (n = 19) and control-arm patients with either TMB and BRAF status combination (n = 31). With TMB ≥9 or BRAF-V600E and normal, non-inflammatory level of C-reactive protein when starting nivolumab (n = 11), median PFS was 35.0 months (95% confidence interval, 6.8-63.0; p < 0.0001).
conclusionsTMB, somatic BRAF status and systemic inflammation should be prospectively investigated as practical biomarkers for predicting potential responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic microsatellite-stable/mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.