Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731112›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Regional analysis of impedance shifts in paediatric cochlear implantation: insights into early electrode-tissue interface dynamics.

Mani Mala, Richi Sinha, Rakesh Kumar Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mani MalaDepartment of ENT, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sheikhpura, Patna, Bihar, 800014, India.
Richi SinhaDepartment of ENT, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sheikhpura, Patna, Bihar, 800014, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4246-6530
Rakesh Kumar SinghDepartment of ENT, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sheikhpura, Patna, Bihar, 800014, India. rksent5@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8411-2194

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImpedance telemetry objectively reflects the electrode–tissue interface and provides quantitative information on early postoperative impedance behavior after cochlear implantation. This study examined regional impedance shifts from surgery to early follow-up in paediatric recipients.

methodsIn a prospective cohort of 51 children (< 14 years) implanted with identical 22-electrode arrays, intraoperative impedances were recorded and compared with 3-month postoperative values. Electrodes were grouped by region: basal (E1–E8), mid-turn (E9–E14), and apical segment (E15–E22), and analysed for median impedance changes by region, frequency, and persistence of anomalies, as well as inter-regional correlations.

resultsThe most significant change occurred in the basal segment, where median impedance increased from 7.75 to 9.38 kΩ (p < 0.0001), remained unchanged in the mid-turn (9.0 kΩ), and decreased slightly from 10.13 to 10.0 kΩ in the apical segment. Impedance shifts were strongly correlated across cochlear regions (rs = 0.65–0.91, p < 0.001), except for a weaker association between the basal and apical segments (rs = 0.36, p < 0.05). Among the 1,122 recorded electrode contacts, six displayed open- or short-circuit anomalies intraoperatively; most persisted at the same contacts, with one short circuit resolving and no new anomalies detected at 3 months.

conclusionEarly postoperative impedance rises most prominently in basal segment contacts, consistent with expected early postoperative changes at the electrode–tissue interface, while mid-turn and apical segment contacts mostly remain stable or decline slightly. Ongoing impedance monitoring from implantation through early follow-up is vital for evaluating the electrode–tissue interface, optimising device programming, and identifying electrodes requiring deactivation or closer surveillance.

Indexed as

CochleaCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsElectric ImpedanceAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleHumansInfantMalePostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesTelemetryCochlear implantationEarly postoperativeElectrode–tissue interfaceImpedance telemetryPaediatric

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.