Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731110›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Beyond standard audiometry: Auditory dysfunction and steroid treatment outcomes in young adults following acoustic trauma.

Yael Zaltz, Yael Solomon, Yisgav Shapira, Amit Wolfovitz, Daphne Ari-Even Roth, Yael Henkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yael Zaltz *Hearing, Speech, and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. yaelzaltz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0927-0528
Yael Solomon *Hearing, Speech, and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Yisgav ShapiraDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel.
Amit WolfovitzDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel.
Daphne Ari-Even RothHearing, Speech, and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Yael HenkinHearing, Speech, and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe impact of military noise exposure on auditory function is not well established and may not be fully captured by standard audiometry. This study aimed to evaluate: (1) the effects of military noise exposure on auditory function in young adults using (a) self-reported otological symptoms, (b) standard and ultra-high frequency (UHF; 9–14 kHz) audiometry, (c) distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE); (2) oral steroids effects on audiometric results, outer hair-cell function, and otological symptoms.

methodsA retrospective review of medical records was conducted for 189 young adults exposed to military noise. Participants with normal hearing underwent one assessment, while those with hearing loss or otological symptoms were reassessed after ~ 10 days and 3 months. Steroid-treated patients were compared to untreated controls.

resultsOver half the cohort showed hearing loss in the standard or UHF range. Otological symptoms, particularly tinnitus and aural fullness, were prevalent even among individuals with normal standard-range thresholds. UHF audiometry and DPOAEs detected abnormalities missed by standard audiometry. Partial spontaneous recovery occurred within 10 days post-injury. Steroid treatment was linked to greater hearing thresholds improvements, particularly in the high-frequency range. UHF recovery was significantly greater in the right ear, suggesting asymmetry in vulnerability and recovery patterns.

conclusionMilitary noise exposure leads to a highly prevalent and multifaceted impact on auditory function. Although treated patients showed greater gains, post-exposure threshold differences between treated and untreated patients restrict direct inference regarding steroid efficacy. Comprehensive assessment, including symptoms, UHF audiometry, and DPOAEs, is essential for accurate diagnosis and monitoring.

Indexed as

GlucocorticoidsHearing Loss, Noise-InducedMilitary PersonnelAdolescentAdultAudiometryAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory AcuityFemaleHumansMaleOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousRetrospective StudiesTinnitusTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultGlucocorticoidsAcoustic traumaBlast injuryDPOSESteroidsTinnitusUHF

Identifiers

PMID41731110
PMCPMC13053575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.