ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026
Predictors of failure to rescue in surgical rescue.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo determine the current status of surgical rescue (SR) and examine the predictors of failure to rescue (FTR). In acute care surgery, predictors of FTR have only been reported in patients with trauma, not in SR.
methodsThis retrospective study included 142 patients who underwent emergency surgery at our institution between April 2019 and March 2023. The primary outcome was the identification of the FTR predictors using logistic regression analysis. The secondary outcome was the development of a Surgical Rescue Severity Score (SRSS) using these SR predictors and long-term outcomes.
resultsThe patients were divided into survival and mortality groups (122 and 20, respectively). American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) and quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scores were higher in the mortality group. In contrast, the survival group included more cases of SR necessitated by surgical treatment. In multivariate analysis, ASA-PS ≥ 3 (odds ratio [OR], 5.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–36), complications caused by non-surgical therapy (OR, 5.5; 95% CI 1.8–19), and qSOFA score ≥ 2 (OR, 4.5; 95% CI 1.3–17) were independent prognostic factors. The total risk factors for FTR obtained in the multivariate analysis were calculated and established as the SRSS. The long-term prognosis of SR was examined and stratified by the SRSS (P = 0.0001).
conclusionPredictors of FTR in SR were ASA-PS ≥ 3, qSOFA score ≥ 2, and complications caused by non-surgical therapy. The SRSS stratified the short- and long-term prognoses of SR and predicted prognoses preoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.