ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Large language model and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI-based risk stratification system for postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a Fully Automated Stratification System (FASS) integrating serum biomarkers, automated radiomic features, and large language model (LLM)-derived semantic features for prognostic prediction in patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatic resection. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 448 patients with solitary HCC from three centers were retrospectively enrolled. Automated tumor segmentation was performed using a modified MedNeXt-loss framework, and radiomic features were extracted from Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI. Five LLMs were compared for feature-level accuracy and completeness, and the best-performing model was incorporated into the FASS. Prognostic models based on serum, radiomic, and LLM-semantic features were integrated and evaluated using concordance index, time-dependent ROC, and decision curve analyses. Biological relevance was explored through RNA sequencing and pathway enrichment analyses.
resultsThe MedNeXt-loss framework achieved robust segmentation (Dice = 0.77). ChatGPT-4o demonstrated the best balance between predictive accuracy and completeness and was used for subsequent modeling. In multivariate analysis, AFP, AST, and the ChatGPT-4o-derived irregular margin were independent predictors of overall survival. The integrated FASS achieved high prognostic performance (C-index 0.78 and 0.76 in test and external validation cohorts) and effectively stratified patients into distinct risk groups (log-rank p < 0.05). Transcriptomic analyses revealed inflammatory and cytokine signaling activation in the high-risk group.
conclusionFASS enables fully automated, interpretable, and biologically informed prognostic assessment in solitary HCC, supporting precision decision-making in hepatobiliary oncology. KEY POINTS: QuestionCan large language models improve preoperative hepatocellular carcinoma risk stratification by integrating advanced image interpretation and semantic analysis? FindingsThe system enabled fully automated analysis, identified AFP, AST and LLM-derived irregular margin as independent predictors, and effectively stratified postoperative risk across cohorts. Clinical relevanceThis fully automated, interpretable platform enables reliable postoperative risk stratification, helping identify high-risk patients early and potentially improving outcomes after resection of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41731093What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.