ArticleSpinal cord2026
Impact of surgeon experience on surgical outcomes after posterior decompression for degenerative cervical myelopathy: A prospective multicenter study.
Article in Spinal cord, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designProspective multicenter cohort study.
objectivesTo investigate how surgeon experience influences surgical, radiologic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after posterior decompression in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).
settingThe multiple institutions in Japan.
methodsWe prospectively enrolled 775 patients with DCM who underwent posterior decompression at 10 academic institutions in Japan. Surgeries were performed by either board-certified spine (BCS) surgeons or non-BCS (NBCS) surgeons under direct BCS supervision. Outcomes included surgical parameters, radiographic findings, physician-reported measures, and PROMs, such as the JOA score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, JOACMEQ, and SF-36 scores, assessed preoperatively and at 2 years follow-up.
resultsBaseline demographics were comparable between groups, except for a higher prevalence of diabetes in the BCS group (p = 0.044). The NBCS group had longer surgical duration (91.1 ± 33.1 minutes vs. 109.4 ± 51.8 minutes, p < 0.001) and greater blood loss (33.7 ± 56.3 mL vs. 45.9 ± 79.4 mL, p = 0.018), despite fewer operated laminae (4.1 ± 1.1 vs. 3.8 ± 1.2, p < 0.001). Perioperative complication rates and radiographic outcomes at 2 years were similar between groups. Both groups showed significant improvements in JOA scores, VAS, all JOACMEQ domains, and most SF-36 subscales, with no significant differences between groups.
conclusionPosterior decompression for DCM can achieve favorable results when performed by NBCS surgeons under BCS supervision, with outcomes equivalent to those of BCS surgeons. These findings support the safety and educational value of supervised training in spine surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41731068What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.