ArticleScientific reports2026
Thirty years of contact angles reveal universal design rules for wetting control.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wettability, commonly quantified by the static contact angle (θ), governs critical interfacial phenomena including anti-icing, self-cleaning, adhesion control, and lubrication. Although conceptual thresholds for superhydrophilic and superhydrophobic states are widely cited, their empirical validation across material classes has remained limited by the absence of a comprehensive, rigorously verified dataset spanning diverse surfaces and liquids. Here, we compile and systematically analyze 110 curated static contact-angle measurements reported between 1995 and 2025, encompassing polymers, metals, oxides, self-assembled monolayers (SAMs), and micro-/nano-textured surfaces measured with multiple probe liquids. Our meta-analysis quantitatively confirms the existence of universal critical thresholds, with θ ≲ 20° defining superhydrophilicity and θ ≳ 150° defining superhydrophobicity. Crucially, for textured and hierarchical surfaces, these limits emerge as geometry-dominated properties, persisting across material classes and largely independent of intrinsic surface chemistry. These validated thresholds establish clear, principle-driven design rules for engineering functional wetting behavior, moving beyond trial-and-error approaches. The resulting dataset provides a reliable benchmark for the community, supporting predictive wettability design, cross-study meta-analysis, and the development of data-driven and machine-learning models without the need for repetitive experimental measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.