Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731026›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Thirty years of contact angles reveal universal design rules for wetting control.

Amir Karimdoost Yasuri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amir Karimdoost YasuriDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran. yasuri.am@lu.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wettability, commonly quantified by the static contact angle (θ), governs critical interfacial phenomena including anti-icing, self-cleaning, adhesion control, and lubrication. Although conceptual thresholds for superhydrophilic and superhydrophobic states are widely cited, their empirical validation across material classes has remained limited by the absence of a comprehensive, rigorously verified dataset spanning diverse surfaces and liquids. Here, we compile and systematically analyze 110 curated static contact-angle measurements reported between 1995 and 2025, encompassing polymers, metals, oxides, self-assembled monolayers (SAMs), and micro-/nano-textured surfaces measured with multiple probe liquids. Our meta-analysis quantitatively confirms the existence of universal critical thresholds, with θ ≲ 20° defining superhydrophilicity and θ ≳ 150° defining superhydrophobicity. Crucially, for textured and hierarchical surfaces, these limits emerge as geometry-dominated properties, persisting across material classes and largely independent of intrinsic surface chemistry. These validated thresholds establish clear, principle-driven design rules for engineering functional wetting behavior, moving beyond trial-and-error approaches. The resulting dataset provides a reliable benchmark for the community, supporting predictive wettability design, cross-study meta-analysis, and the development of data-driven and machine-learning models without the need for repetitive experimental measurements.

Indexed as

Contact angleData curationMaterials informaticsMeta-analysisSuperhydrophobicitySurface designWettability

Identifiers

PMID41731026
PMCPMC13031877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.