Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731002›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Multimodal fusion for equipment health status assessment based on dynamic attention mechanism.

Yao Lei, Jianyin Zhao, Weimin Lv, Song Gao, Jinhe Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yao LeiNaval Aviation University, Yantai, 264001, China.
Jianyin ZhaoNaval Aviation University, Yantai, 264001, China. 895359025@qq.com.
Weimin LvNaval Aviation University, Yantai, 264001, China.
Song GaoNaval Aviation University, Yantai, 264001, China.
Jinhe YuNaval Aviation University, Yantai, 264001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately capturing the evolving temporal correlations between unstructured textual features and multi-modal parameter data is pivotal for robust equipment health assessment. Conventional multimodal fusion methods typically fail to capture temporal variations across modalities: text features exhibit stage-specific changes, such as slight abnormal noise in the early fault stage and severe vibration in the late degradation stage, while parameter data contains latent temporal patterns like wavelet energy accumulation in specific frequency bands during the fault precursor period. The attention mechanism is a highly promising architecture to address this issue. This study proposes a dynamic attention-driven multimodal feature fusion method for equipment health status assessment. This method integrates a hybrid time-frequency encoding framework, combining wavelet packet decomposition (WPD), fast Fourier transform (FFT), and discrete Fourier transform (DFT) with textual feature extraction based on bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT). On the Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) bearing fault dataset, the proposed method improves classification accuracy by 7.2% compared with conventional symmetric attention models and achieves an AUC-ROC of 0.951. The proposed method captures evolving multimodal signals, allowing for more accurate and interpretable health assessment, thereby providing valuable technical support for real-time monitoring and preventive maintenance of equipment.

Indexed as

Health StatusAlgorithmsFourier AnalysisHumansWavelet AnalysisAdaptive learningDynamic attentionEquipment health monitoringMultimodal fusionTiming characteristics

Identifiers

PMID41731002
PMCPMC13031405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.