ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2026
Cardiotoxicity of T cell immunotherapies.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Toxicity Associated With Bispecific Antibodies in Hematological Malignancies: A Comprehensive Pharmacovigilance Analysis.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- The New Cardio-Oncology Frontier in Hematologic Cancers: Cardiovascular Toxicities of CAR-T Cells and Bispecific T-Cell Engagers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiotoxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Advancing precision cardio-oncology: multimodal surveillance and stratified management of immunotherapy-induced cardiovascular toxicity.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
T cell immunotherapies offer a new approach to cancer therapy. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is the most prolific of these treatments, leveraging genetically engineered T cells to augment the antitumour response. Bispecific antibodies, T cell receptor-engineered T cells and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes have also emerged as novel T cell therapies with therapeutic benefit. As the variety of T cell therapies and indications for their use expand, a nuanced understanding of potential haemodynamic sequelae and cardiovascular toxicities is required. T cell activation can lead to massive cytokine release and excessive inflammation, termed cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Like other inflammatory syndromes, CRS can lead to cardiovascular complications, including arrhythmias, myocardial infarction and heart failure, with an incidence of cardiovascular events as high as 20% among patients who develop high-grade CRS. In this Review, we summarize the mechanisms, epidemiology and management of T cell therapy-associated CRS and subsequent cardiotoxicity. We also explore how an improved understanding of CAR T cell therapy, and other emerging T cell-based treatments, will inform the prevention and management of adverse cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.