Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41730963›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Neural investigation of default effects on decision-making under uncertainty.

Jiaxin Yu, Xu Liu, Jianling Yu, Yan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiaxin YuBusiness School, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Xu LiuDepartment of Pain Medicine, Shenzhen Municipal Key Laboratory for Pain Medicine, Affiliated Nanshan Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518052, Guangdong, China.
Jianling YuSchool of Economics and Management, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian, China.
Yan WangSchool of Fintech, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, Liaoning, 116025, People's Republic of China. wangyan2240@163.com.

Funding

Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of Ministry of Education of China 22YJCZH181National Natural Science Foundation of China 72303202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Default options have increasingly become a common tool for policymakers in guiding individuals’ behaviors. However, the neural mechanisms of default effects on decision-making, particularly in uncertain situations, remain unclear. In the present study, participants were asked to decide whether to stick with the default options in a gambling task, and their scalp potentials were recorded. The behavioral results indicated that the default effects did exist, given that participants demonstrated a significantly higher likelihood of selecting uncertain payoffs when these were presented as default options, as opposed to when certain payoffs were designated as defaults. The electroencephalography (EEG) data revealed that the assessment of default setting, comparing default uncertain options with default certain options, was reflected not only in early ERP components (such as P200 and MFN) but also in increased activity within the theta frequency band. Certain payoffs elicited larger P200 and MFN amplitudes compared to uncertain payoffs under default settings, and time-frequency analysis revealed greater theta power when the default options involved payoffs (rather than uncertain payoffs). Additionally, ambiguity aversion manifested not only in behavioral tendencies but also in distinct neural signatures, reflected across multiple ERP components associated with early evaluation (such as P200, MFN) and later motivational processing (such as P300, LPP). To further capture how these neural responses relate to behavior, we applied representational similarity analysis (RSA), which revealed that choice patterns were systematically associated with frontal neural activity during an early evaluative stage. Moreover, regression analyses indicated that later-stage neural responses, particularly the LPP, were predictive of individuals’ subsequent uncertainty choices, suggesting that both early evaluation processes and later motivational evaluations contribute to shaping behavior under uncertainty and defaults.

Indexed as

BrainDecision MakingAdultElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleGamblingHumansMaleUncertaintyYoung AdultAmbiguityDefault effectsERPNudgeRisk

Identifiers

PMID41730963
PMCPMC13031513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.