Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41730957›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Quantum transfer learning for cross-domain cybersecurity threat detection and categorization.

Shtwai Alsubai, Mohamed Ayari, Natalia Kryvinska, Ahmad Almadhor, Jamel Baili, Abdullah Al Hejaili, Sidra Abbas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shtwai AlsubaiCollege of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, 16273, AlKharj, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed AyariDepartment of Information Technology, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, Northern Border University, 73222, Arar, Saudi Arabia. mohamed.ayari@nbu.edu.sa.
Natalia KryvinskaDepartment of Information Management and Business Systems, Faculty of Management, Comenius University Bratislava, Odbojarov 10, 82005, Bratislava 25, Slovakia.
Ahmad AlmadhorDepartment of Computer Engineering and Networks, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, 72388, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
Jamel BailiDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, 61413, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Al HejailiFaculty of Computers & Information Technology, Computer Science Department, University of Tabuk, 71491, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Sidra AbbasDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal, 57000, Pakistan. sidraabbas@ieee.org.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University RGP.2/379/45Northern Borders University NBU-FFR-2025-2443-xx
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cybersecurity challenges have become increasingly complex and widespread, and the risks associated with these problems are substantial, affecting thousands of individuals and organisations and being crucial to national security. As cybercriminals have become increasingly adept at utilizing advanced methods to exploit system vulnerabilities, there has never been a more pressing need for reliable threat detection and response systems. This study proposes a framework that uses quantum transfer learning to enhance cybersecurity threat detection by leveraging multiple datasets, including UNSW-NB15, CICIDS2017, CSE-CIC-IDS2018, and TON_IoT. The framework focuses on improving the accuracy and efficiency of existing machine learning methods for cyber threat detection by employing quantum computing techniques for feature extraction and analysis. The pre-processing of the UNSW-NB15 dataset, the extraction of quantum features using PennyLane, and the training of the deep learning model with TensorFlow are the steps in the workflow of this study. Finally, the model is fine-tuned through transfer learning on other datasets, resulting in improvements in detection accuracy. This study shows that our quantum-enhanced model attains an accuracy of 83% on UNSW-NB15, 91% on the combined CICIDS2017 and CSE-CIC-IDS2018 datasets, and 86% on the TON_IoT dataset, demonstrating the potential of quantum computing and its use in the field of cybersecurity. Unlike fully quantum classifiers, our approach applies quantum transformations only at the feature-extraction stage, thereby creating a hybrid classical-quantum workflow that enhances transfer-learning performance across multiple cybersecurity datasets.

Indexed as

CICIDS2017CSE-CIC-IDS2018CybersecurityDeep learningImbalanced dataQuantum feature extractionQuantum transfer learningThreat detectionTON_IoTUNSW-NB15

Identifiers

PMID41730957
PMCPMC13031859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.