ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptive Bayesian learning for stability characterization of re-entry vehicles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate characterization of aerodynamic stability coefficients is essential for predicting the dynamic behavior of atmospheric re-entry vehicles. Estimating these coefficients from free-flight data is challenging due to nonlinear flow–structure coupling, limited data, and high computational costs. Existing nonlinear parameter estimation methods often provide only discrete results without full uncertainty quantification, emphasizing the need for a continuous and uncertainty-aware framework. This study introduces an adaptive Bayesian surrogate approach that combines differential evolution (DE), Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), and Gaussian process regression with an upper confidence bound adaptive-sampling strategy to infer both static and dynamic stability coefficients from computational fluid dynamics data. The approach first uses DE–MCMC to estimate baseline aerodynamic coefficients at discrete control-points and then iteratively refines smooth, uncertainty-bounded functional curves through adaptive learning. Demonstrations on one-degree-of-freedom free-flight simulations of the Genesis re-entry capsule at Mach 1.10–1.50 show that the refined surrogates capture physically consistent trends across the angle of attack range, reduce epistemic uncertainty by more than 50 percent, and achieve mean reconstruction errors below 0.7[Formula: see text] for training and within 1.5[Formula: see text] for validation cases. The framework provides an efficient, data-driven route for constructing continuous aerodynamic-stability response surfaces with quantified confidence, supporting predictive modeling and digital-twin development for re-entry systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.