ArticleScientific reports2026
Accelerometer-based assessment of occupational standing time and its association with venous disorders - results of a cross-sectional field study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathophysiologically, prolonged standing is associated with varicose veins (VV) or pathological venous reflux. Prior work-related epidemiological studies are inconclusive due to crude and imprecise exposure assessments. This cross-sectional field study explored the association between work-related standing time and VV or pathological reflux, assessed using wearables. Daily standing time was tracked by accelerometer and categorized: ≤2 vs. >2 but ≤4 vs. >4 h. Long-term cumulative standing exposure were estimated by combining accelerometer and survey data. Employees underwent CEAP classification and duplex ultrasound to measure lower leg reflux. The associations between standing time and other predictors on VV or reflux were analyzed by multiple logistic regression. 198 employees working ≥30 h and ≥4 days per week for ≥2y in logistics, trade, retail, manufacturing, healthcare, research, and service sectors were included (n = 116♀, Ø-age = 40 ± 9y). 18% (n = 36) stood ≤2 h, 46% (n = 91) >2 but ≤4 h, 36% (n = 71) >4 h per day. Long-term cumulative standing exposure was 10,145.0 ± 8,396.0 h. 24% (n = 47) were described with VV, 38% (n = 74) with reflux. While neither daily nor long-term cumulative standing time were significantly associated with VV or reflux, age and family history were. Our findings partly contradict previous epidemiological studies, highlighting the value of objectively measured activity patterns for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.