Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41730920›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Supervised learning for predicting unknown modifying variables in pliable lasso.

Zainab Subhi Mahmood Hawrami, Mehmet Ali Cengiz, Emre Dünder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zainab Subhi Mahmood HawramiMinistry of Higher Education and Scientific Research-KRG, Erbil, Iraq.
Mehmet Ali CengizDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. mamcengiz@imamu.edu.sa.
Emre DünderDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) IMSIU-DDRSP2601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate outcome prediction often requires modeling complex interactions between input features and context-specific modifiers. The pliable lasso is a flexible regression framework that integrates such modifiers into the prediction process. In many real-world applications, however, these modifiers are unobserved at test time and must be estimated. This study investigates the performance of eight supervised machine learning algorithms for estimating the modifier matrix Z in a pliable lasso model under a known-to-unknown scenario. The analysis considers both classification accuracy for modifier estimation and regression accuracy for the final response prediction, using simulated data and two relevant real-world datasets: the Superconductivity dataset and the Mice Protein Expression dataset. Results indicate that tree-based ensemble models (e.g., XGBoost, Random Forest, and Decision Tree) deliver superior modifier classification (AUC > 0.99), while regularized models such as Lasso and Elastic Net achieve the best regression performance. The findings support a hybrid modeling approach in which tree-based classifiers estimate modifying variables, followed by regularized regression for accurate and interpretable predictions.

Indexed as

Machine learningModifying variablePliable lasso modelPrediction variableSupervised learning algorithms

Identifiers

PMID41730920
PMCPMC13022117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.