ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptive multihazard modeling predicts rainfall-driven dam failure: a case study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bayesian optimization for uncertainty-aware prediction of rainfall-induced deformation in embankment dams.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The safety of earth-rockfill dams during construction is critically challenged by transient hydrological loads and evolving boundary conditions. While numerical and data-driven models exist, their standalone application is limited; the former is computationally prohibitive for real-time forecasting, and the latter often lacks physical interpretability. To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel hybrid framework that tightly couples Finite Element analysis (FEM) with deep learning (ANN-LSTM) for the physics-constrained forecasting of rainfall-induced instability. The model leverages FEM to simulate the hydro-mechanical response, the LSTM to capture temporal patterns in monitoring data, and an ANN to map strength degradation, with an attention mechanism identifying critical antecedent failure sequences. Validated on a two-year monitoring dataset from the Megech Dam, which experienced documented instabilities, our framework significantly outperformed established baselines. It achieved a superior MAE of 0.027 (vs. 0.081 for SVM, 0.067 for Random Forest, and 0.052 for standalone LSTM, p < 0.05) and provided an early-warning lead time of up to 3.5 weeks by identifying the critical lag between rainfall peaks and pore-pressure buildup. The integrated attention mechanism autonomously highlighted weeks 25–30 and 75–80 as high-risk periods, aligning with field observations. This work demonstrates that a physics-informed hybrid approach offers a more reliable and interpretable tool for early-warning systems than purely data-driven methods. The proposed framework is adaptable to other earth-rockfill dams, providing a pathway from reactive monitoring to proactive risk management during critical construction phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.