ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2026
Key factors for implementing inhaler regimen switches in respiratory diseases: international expert consensus generated using a modified nominal group technique (NGT).
Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop international expert consensus statements on when and how to implement inhaler switches for patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, informing clinicians and decision-makers on appropriate circumstances, stakeholder roles, and essential steps for safe and effective switching. An international panel of eight clinical, payer, and patient experts participated in a nominal group technique. Ideas were generated in response to four research questions and rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = not at all important; 7 = extremely important). The decision-making unit framework was applied for stakeholder mapping. Clinical and patient-focused drivers were identified as the most important drivers for inhaler switching (rated very or extremely important by >60% of experts), which included inadequate disease control, inhaler technique errors, switching to maintenance and reliever therapy, adding a spacer, and addressing poor satisfaction. Operational factors such as supply shortages were considered moderately important, while environmental and cost-related drivers were considered least important (rated not at all important to neutral by >60% of experts). Inappropriate circumstances for inhaler switching centred on patient safety (rated very or extremely important by >85% of experts), including lack of consultation, consent, education, or follow-up, switching clinically stable patients, and introducing complex regimens. Of essential activities required for a consultation, experts estimated a median time of 36 min would be required. Experts suggest inhaler switches should prioritise clinical need and patient involvement over cost or sustainability goals, and suggest policymakers consider the time and complexity required for implementation at scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.