Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41730792›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2026

Exploring the Boundaries of Modern Quantum Annealers with RNA Structure Prediction.

Brian Andrews, Jacob Abraham, Dillion Fox, Asja Radja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian AndrewsDepartment of Physics, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19010, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4469-3147
Jacob AbrahamDepartment of Physics, Haverford College, Haverford, Pennsylvania 19041, United States.
Dillion FoxAI/ML, GSK, Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426, United States.
Asja RadjaDepartment of Physics, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19010, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1941-9843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) has gained popularity over the past ten years both for the wide range of problems that can be expressed in this form and for its compatibility with many quantum computing architectures. More recently, quantum annealers have advanced to the point where the scaling of qubits makes real-world applications increasingly feasible; however, current architectures remain restricted to solving quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems, which can represent at most two-body interactions. Here we systematically examine the shortcomings of the QUBO framework and modern quantum annealers through the lens of the high-dimensional, exponentially scaling problem of RNA structure prediction, and find results that are generalizable to QUBO formalisms writ large. We find that using the QUBO framework to predict RNA structures results in poor accuracy, which becomes worse as system size scales. We determine that the fundamental constraint of two-body interactions prevents emergent correlations in the system, which are crucial to accurate structure prediction. Furthermore, we highlight that explicit, higher-order, empirical terms that are needed to improve structure prediction are incompatible with a QUBO framework. Finally, we show that our energy landscape has many deep local minima, which lead to local minima trapping and prevent permutation invariance. The relevance of these findings to other applications of QUBO, and therefore to modern quantum annealers more broadly, are discussed, with our work providing the first explicit explanation of why these formalisms have failed and will continue to fail in high-dimensional systems with similar constraints.

Identifiers

PMID41730792
PMCPMC12969264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.