ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Comparative study of orthopaedic robot-assisted and arthroscopy-assisted treatment of Rockwood type
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of arthroscopy-assisted and orthopaedic robot-assisted techniques in the treatment of Rockwood type Ⅲ and Ⅳ acute acromioclavicular dislocation. Methods: The clinical data of 33 patients with acromioclavicular dislocation who were treated with titanium plate with loop fixation between October 2022 and December 2024 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into robot group (17 cases) and arthroscopy group (16 cases) according to the different ways of assisted surgery. There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups ( Results: The incisions of the two groups healed by first intention. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total length of incision, and the change of VAS score at 1 day after operation in the robot group were significantly less than those in the arthroscopy group ( Conclusion: Both assisted techniques of internal fixation with titanium plate with loop can achieve good effectiveness in the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. Robot assisted surgery has advantages in incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative VAS score, and early postoperative shoulder joint function, but arthroscopic assisted surgery has advantages in intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency and accuracy of coracoid drilling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.