ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Effectiveness comparison of transforaminal endoscopy and unilateral biportal endoscopy for far lateral lumbar disc herniation].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) discectomy in the treatment of far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 60 patients with FLLDH, who were admitted between September 2021 and September 2024 and met the selection criteria, including 30 cases treated with PTED and 30 cases with UBE discectomy. There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups ( Results: All patients successfully underwent operation. In the PTED group, 1 patient experienced intolerable leg pain during the procedure, which was managed with potent analgesics allowing the operation to proceed uneventfully. In the UBE group, 1 patient developed peritoneal effusion postoperatively and required peritoneal puncture drainage. All incisions healed by first intention. The UBE group demonstrated significantly longer operation time and incision length, and more intraoperative blood loss compared to the PTED group ( Conclusion: Both PTED and UBE discectomy are effective minimally invasive approaches for FLLDH with confirmed short-term effectiveness. PTED offers advantages in reduced trauma and faster recovery, whereas UBE discectomy provides superior endoscopic visualization with lower nerve root injury risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.