ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2026
Effects of Obesity on Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity is linked to increased spinal degenerative pathology and higher perioperative risks in spinal surgery. As the global obesity rates continue to rise, spine surgeons increasingly turn to minimally invasive approaches to theoretically minimize risk, but its outcomes are unclear.
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for the lumbar spine.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases to examine the effects of obesity on MIS lumbar spine surgeries. Perioperative outcomes were categorized by surgical procedures, specifically lumbar fusion and decompression surgeries. Patients with obesity were further stratified into 2 groups: (1) obese (all classes) vs nonobese, and (2) class II/III obese vs nonobese.
resultsTwenty-six cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. In MIS lumbar fusion procedures, patients with obesity experienced higher blood loss (14 studies,
conclusionWhile MIS for obese lumbar spine patients may mitigate perioperative risk, it does not eliminate it. Obesity remains associated with increased blood loss, longer operative times, extended hospital stays, and higher revision rates. Future research should investigate mid- to long-term consequences, including complications, pseudarthrosis, and rates of revision surgery, in patients with obesity undergoing MIS lumbar interventions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients should be counseled about the risks associated with obesity, and preoperative weight optimization is recommended to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.