Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41730684›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2026

Comparative Sulcal Morphology of the Late Miocene Fossil Ape, Rudapithecus hungaricus.

Griffin A Assance, Mary T Silcox, David R Begun

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Griffin A AssanceDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-4363-3192
Mary T SilcoxDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada.
David R BegunDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Beausoleil First NationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEndocasts of fossil hominoids are exceedingly rare. The only fossil ape endocast analyzed in detail is that of Ekembo nyanzae (KNM-RU 7290), from the early Miocene of Kenya. Two partial crania of Rudapithecus hungaricus, from the late Miocene of Hungary, preserve sufficient details to reconstruct large amounts of endocranial morphology of this fossil hominine. No other non-hominin fossil hominid endocast preserves external morphology with the same completeness and detail. Here, we provide the first complete description of the Rudapithecus sulcal pattern. MATERIALS AND

methodsSulcal patterns from a comparative sample of extant non-hominin hominoid endocasts were identified according to classical descriptions of hominoid sulcal patterns. Sulcal patterns of both Rudapithecus endocasts were identified using both classical descriptions of hominoid sulcal patterns and comparisons with morphology identified in the extant sample.

resultsWe identify a hominid-like sulcal pattern in Rudapithecus that is more complex than hylobatids but simpler than Pan, most closely resembling Gorilla and Pongo while exhibiting several Gorilla affinities. DISCUSSION: The study of the Rudapithecus crania reveals a de-coupling in hominid brain evolution. Cranial shape overall is African ape-like, the shape of the endocast is more primitive, and the sulcal pattern is generally hominid-like. The Rudapithecus endocasts provide evidence of the primitive condition of the brain in hominine evolution.

Indexed as

FossilsHominidaeSkullAnimalsBiological EvolutionHungaryKenyabrain evolutionencephalizationendocastshominidshominines

Identifiers

PMID41730684
PMCPMC12929042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.