ReviewBMJ open quality2026
Rapid response teams for new leaders: a narrative review of global evidence and implementation strategies with a focus on Japan.
Review in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive performance of an extended NEWS model for acute deterioration in general ward inpatients: a retrospective observational study.Journal of Korean biological nursing science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRapid response systems (RRSs) are designed to detect and treat physiological deterioration before cardiac arrest occurs. Since 2020, Japan has seen a rapid increase in RRS adoption; however, most new team members have not received formal training in critical care. This review synthesises international and Japanese evidence supporting implementation and training for new members.
methodsPubMed, Web of Science and Ichushi Web were searched for English or Japanese studies evaluating adult RRSs (January 2010-April 2025). We included 47 records (43 comparative and 4 systematic reviews); the national guideline was not included.
resultsMature RRSs were associated with a 35% relative reduction in unexpected in-hospital cardiac arrests and a 12% decrease in all-cause hospital mortality. However, the evidence is not uniformly positive-systematic reviews and multicentre analyses reported no significant mortality benefit-and outcome heterogeneity limits comparability. Effective programmes share three key features: (1) single-parameter activation criteria augmented by early-warning scores; (2) tiered response models for advanced practice nurses and (3) audit-feedback cycles with dashboards. Crew resource management, in situ simulation and mindfulness-based self-leadership approaches may be associated with reduced decision latency. Emerging tools like deep-learning prediction algorithms, continuous wearable monitoring and tele-support systems may expand coverage but require governance. Common barriers include limited night-time staffing, cultural reluctance to escalate care and medicolegal ambiguity; targeted education and registry-driven feedback mitigate challenges.
conclusionsWell-structured RRSs improve outcomes beyond traditional code-blue models. Aligning activation thresholds, multidisciplinary competencies and data-driven quality improvement cycles with local resources may help new Japanese rapid response team members develop resilient, high-performing services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.